Researchers Workshop Your rights What needs to change

Researchers Workshop Your rights What needs to change

Researchers Workshop Your rights What needs to change How to make changes Big contribution Little reward Projects, experiments etc are short term but research programmes are long term Can be demotivating under-valued, researchers take on main burden of risk Inefficient promising researchers leave.

Lack of dissemination of information. Break-up of teams. Transferable skills not recognised Researchers a priority Negotiate agreements that increase job security Negotiate on support for research careers Raise researchers issues with ministers, funding councils and all interested parties We need more researchers to join us: your voice is heard; issues raised; a stronger negotiating position BRANCHES in

over 600 colleges and universities BRANCHES first port of call if you have a problem nearly 120,000 education staff belong to UCU BRANCHES send delegates to annual Congress MEMBERS BRANCHES have

elected officers UCU is a democratic organisation and members vote on branch, regional and national decisions BRANCHES run by members who volunteer to help BRANCHES negotiate with your employer

REGIONS each has a staffed Regional Office to support and help organise branches (national offices in Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland) Policies are decided at annual Congress where branches send delegates to vote on their behalf REGIONS also

elect a committee to bring together and support branches in a geographical area NATIONAL UNION REGIONS run training for branch reps and volunteers and hold regular meetings for

active members across the region In between Congress decisions are made by a National Executive Committee (NEC) and other groups of elected members UCU negotiates nationally with employers and the government to win improvements for

members and for education The National Executive Committee (UCU members) and full time staff carry out union policy the most senior official is the General Secretary who is elected by members every five years About UCU Negotiate your pay and conditions locally and nationally

Provide individual advice and support (backed by UCU legal scheme) The voice of your profession education policy, research funding and strategy, defending jobs, pensions, education provision Fixed term facts and figures The picture across the UK is that the percentage of fixed-term contracts in use for research staff is on the decline. However, the figures for 2010/11 remain a cause for concern:

68.9% (70.8% 2009/10) Use of FTCs However, there are huge differences in how HEIs use FTCs for research staff. We do know that FTCs are still routinely used for the majority of first appointments but some HEIs do appear to have moved some research staff onto open-ended contracts others appear to continue to use FTCs for the vast majority of research staff. Use of FTCs some examples Institution

Sheffield Liverpool Manchester Lancaster Leeds Cambridge Bristol Glasgow UCL Aberdeen Researchers on FTCs (HESA figures) 10-11 09-10 Total (10-11)

90.7% 90.6% (1010) 87.6% 85.2% (690) 86.4% 87.1% (1925) 85.1% 85.3% (285) 79.9% 77.9% (965) 62.8% 73.8% (3020) 44.4% 42.4% (1085) 15.2% 11.8% (895) 2.6% 2.3% (2395) 2.1% 59.2% (610)

Moving away from FTCS We also know that behind those figures are some very different realities: Some institutions continue to use FTCs for the vast majority of their research Some have moved most staff to open ended contracts Some employers do little to find alternative employment at the end of the FTC or fixed-term funding whilst others do actively engage in seeking to avoid a dismissal at the end of a FTC or fixed-term funding period. Your Rights Statutory rights: FTC Regs, Equal Pay, redundancy payments, statutory

maternity provisions Contractual rights: pay, hours of work Negotiated policy: progression, redundancy avoidance schemes, protection of FTC staff, enhanced maternity provisions Fixed Term Employees (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2002 Employer cannot treat a fixed-term employee any less favourably than a comparable permanent employee unless such treatment can be objectively justified.

Fixed Term Employees (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2002 The use of successive fixed-term contracts will be limited to four years, unless the continued use of a fixed-term contract is justified on objective grounds. Objective Justification UCU has always held that fixed-term funding should not be used as a blanket objective justification for keeping staff - especially researchers - on fixed-term contracts. Our position has now been vindicated in the

case of Ball v Aberdeen University. Ball v Aberdeen Dr Andrew Ball offered a 4th ftc Sought confirmation that he had been made permanent University: no guarantee of further funding, used as objective justification Tribunal said that short-term funding could not automatically provide justification to use a further ftc. Dr Ball made permanent Consultation Lancaster University v UCU (EAT). UCU won. University failed to consult over potential FTC staff

redundancies (with the aim of avoiding the dismissals) Stirling won an appeal (02/12) against UCU on the issue of the legal obligation to consult UCU in collective redundancy situations relating to FTC staff UCU believes that the Stirling decision is inconsistent with previous decisions and are seeking leave to appeal. Improved Security? The legal rights of fixed-term and open-ended staff are the same in relation to dismissal: Dismissals must be for a fair reason There can be no unfair selection for redundancy There should be consultation about dismissals (collective and / or individual) The employer is under a duty to seek ways of

avoiding redundancies After 2 years service there is the right to redundancy pay Improved Security? Improving security of employment means more than securing permanency or an open-ended contract. It means: Staff being treated as an integral part of the University community a cultural change Ensuring that resources are managed in such a way to avoid redundancy situations Breaking the employment link between individual research projects and individual researchers

Having effective systems in place to redeploy staff as and when necessary Negotiating policy 1. Establishing FTC policy along UCU guidelines 2. Once policy agreed, implementation at all levels i.e. HR; line manager or PI is vital 3. Publicity, transparency and good communication at the local/departmental level is very important Responses to short-term funding Centrally structured and managed

communication between PIs working in similar fields about forthcoming projects and grant applications can support forward planning and clarity about available options Responses Researchers work across a number of projects within centres and clusters. Can support retention and development of research capacity Performance related issues should be managed according to relevant policies Better monitoring, record-keeping and communication

Responses Putting in place mechanisms to maintain employment where a researchers work is likely to continue eg bridging funds Proper, fair and consistent redundancy processes Active redeployment policy up to a year before funding ends. Requires good communication, planning, joining together recruitment procedures with at risk staff Research Excellence Framework Research environment how supportive, especially early career researchers

Many excluded from REF but under it must support researchers who work on projects UCU believes that to demonstrate a good research environment departments should show evidence of improving security of research only staff for example support for research staff moving between projects and evidence of support for research careers. How do we create sustainable research careers? Are research careers really that different from others? Only a stepping-stone? How do we increase job security and create

clear career paths? What are the opportunities to achieve this? National role profiles, REF, Concordat, full economic costing, CROS, Researchers Charter. How can we use them? UKRSA working with UCU What Can You Do? Join UCU ( ) Encourage colleagues to join Your rights: Researchers Survival Guide UCU Researchers Network Help your branch you can do as much or

as little as you are able

Recently Viewed Presentations

  • WELCOME The Canadian Doctoral Journey: Promise and Possibility

    WELCOME The Canadian Doctoral Journey: Promise and Possibility

    The deadline and process will also vary depending on where you are apply to make sure to check the processes for the University you intend to apply to! At Nipissing The OGS application is included in your Admission Application, if...
  • Abortion Case Study

    Abortion Case Study

    Either the horseradish or romaine lettuce may be eaten in fulfillment of the mitzvah of eating bitter herbs during the Seder. 5) Z'roa or Zeroah; A roasted lamb shank bone, symbolizing the korban Pesach (Pesach sacrifice), which was a lamb...
  • CS46101 - Kent State University

    CS46101 - Kent State University

    Looping constructs are like in C, C++, Pascal, and Java. We assume that the loop variable in a . for . loop is still defined when the loop exits (unlike in Pascal). / / indicates that the remainder of the...
  • Role of Role of Working Drawings - New Jersey Institute of ...

    Role of Role of Working Drawings - New Jersey Institute of ...

    Add all dimensions; note interior walls become thicker at exterior locations Add reference symbols, door, window tags Add electrical information and symbols; CHECK PRINT Complete floor plan with labels and notes and references * * * * * * *...
  • Adea Pass Task Force

    Adea Pass Task Force

    The Postdoctoral Application Support Service(PASS) is a centralized application service of the American Dental Education Association (ADEA). PASS is available for individuals applying to more than 500 participating advanced dental education (postdoctoral) programs. PASS simplifies the application process by providing...
  • Beyond Difference: Reconfiguring Education for the User-Led Age

    Beyond Difference: Reconfiguring Education for the User-Led Age

    Beyond Difference: Reconfiguring Education for the User-Led Age Dr Axel Bruns Media & Communication Creative Industries Faculty Queensland University of Technology
  • Neutron Physics W. M. Snow Physics Department Indiana

    Neutron Physics W. M. Snow Physics Department Indiana

    Neutron Electric Dipole Moment CP-Violation Experiments CP-Violation Experiments EDM candidates Neutron: Intrinsic EDM Electron/muon: Intrinsic EDM Atoms: P, T violating nucleon-nucleon or nucleon-electron interaction Ions? all sensitive to different physics beyond SM each gives new window on T ...
  • Summary - GST: Cross-border services, intangibles and goods ...

    Summary - GST: Cross-border services, intangibles and goods ...

    At present imported services and low-value goods are not subject to GST. The growth in online shopping has benefitted New Zealand by giving consumers access to a wider market and increasing competition in the domestic retail market. However, ideally, tax...